Philanthropy: the Untapped Trillion-Dollar Climate Opportunity
by Adam Fraser, CEO of Terraset
Before you read this article, try a quick experiment. Ask someone—a colleague in the office, the person on your next call, or even just yourself—what percentage of philanthropic giving goes to tackling climate change?
Actually, let’s broaden that out. When you factor in everything you can think of in terms of nature, conservation, animal welfare, reforestation, biodiversity - absolutely anything that could be thought of as climate-adjacent: what percentage of philanthropic giving do you think goes to support it?
I’ve heard people guess as high as 50% and as low as 20%. I’ve never heard anyone guess as low as the correct answer: 2%. If you got it right, congratulations! However, that’s probably not something to celebrate. The climate crisis—the biggest issue facing humanity—is not an issue that we want people or organizations to ignore when they’re considering which nonprofits to support.
The number is slightly better if we look solely at the US (the world’s largest philanthropic market, by some distance). Here, according to GivingUSA’s 2023 Annual Report on Philanthropy, in the largest economy and most generous philanthropic sector on earth, we all collectively managed to bump that percentage… to 3%.
If you’re curious, that compares to 5% for arts, culture and humanities; 10% for health; 13% for education and 27% for religion. Worryingly, giving to ‘environmental and animal organizations’ (the broad category of ‘everything climate-related you can possibly think of’) decreased 1.6 percent between 2021 and 2022. Adjusted for inflation, notes the report, donations to the environment/animals subsector declined by 8.9 percent.
At Terraset, we spend a lot of time asking ourselves why this is the case. The two most frequent answers we’ve come up with are linked.
First, a lot of people see the climate crisis as someone else’s responsibility.
They assume the government will figure it out. The private sector will find an answer. The markets will move as clean energy becomes cheaper and fossil fuels become pariah. It’ll all be OK in the end. And even if it won’t, it wasn’t my fault, so why should I have to clean it up while the bad guys just keep on doing their thing?
Second, people often can’t see the way that their philanthropic donations can make a difference, even on an issue they care about.
That might be because they have lost a certain amount of hope—and we believe that hope is a greater driver than despair. Or, even more simply, it might be because solutions just don’t exist to empower their involvement. To tackle the former, we need to make sure we tell consistent and engaging stories of genuine change and impact, backed up by transparent, measurable data. To tackle the latter, we need powerful, innovative solutions to be created in ways that can have catalytic, outsize impact.
Take our own focus, carbon removal, as an example of that. The sector has significant tailwinds—and it needs them because the global CDR market is still smaller than the market for nail clippers. However, the relative lack of buyers remains a missing piece of the puzzle. There are not (yet) enough customers buying removals for CDR companies to scale in the way that we all need them to. There are a number of companies, organizations and advocates looking to change this, with the likes of Microsoft, Frontier and Shopify amongst the most publicized and with the biggest purchases. But before we created Terraset, an easily available way to use philanthropic capital to purchase carbon removal simply didn’t exist.
In fact, if the 2% of global philanthropy going to climate as a whole is represented as the orange dots in this image, the percentage going to CDR—in any form, not just purchases—can be seen as the single white dot. Just 2% of 2%.
That’s a concern. Carbon removal is one of the biggest challenges facing humanity today, yet only a fraction of philanthropic giving is making its way into this space. This pattern is seen across all climate-related causes.
The reason that matters isn’t that philanthropy alone can solve the wider climate crisis, but because it plays a crucial role within the capital stack. The US philanthropic market is $499 billion annually and growing. Globally it exceeds $800 billion, and can reasonably be expected to surpass a trillion dollars in the next few years. Ignoring any trillion-dollar market in our efforts to solve the climate crisis would be a missed opportunity.
We also risk missing out on the unique things that philanthropic capital brings to the table. Take CDR as our example again: we need it to scale, fast. We don’t just need this to happen eventually, we need to make progress right now. We need more high-quality carbon removal projects, delivering greater volumes, and we need them as soon as possible. Carbon removed today is worth significantly more than carbon removed in five or ten years. So if the risks and challenges of an early-stage sector mean it isn’t something that makes sense for someone to support with their investment capital, or as part of their business’ sustainability strategy, then philanthropic giving can still allow them to play a key role in this essential space at this critical time. Maybe you don’t need credits, but you can still play a role in directly removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Every philanthropic dollar given right now can go a long way towards eventually removing gigatons of carbon.
And on a broader basis, when we step back out to look at climate as a whole, the same is true. There are solutions that need investment now, whether in adaptation, reduction or mitigation. They might not be ready for the market and they might need time to develop further, but they are there—in a lab, on a concept note, out in the real world or still in someone’s head. Let’s work together to bring them to life and, to help do so, let’s make sure we unlock far more than 2% of that trillion-dollar market. The most pressing issue facing the planet deserves it.
🍿 The Lean Back
Take a tour of Noya’s HQ and learn more about the company’s DAC solution.
🎙️ My Climate Journey Podcast
⛈️ Mishal Thadani, CEO and Co-founder of Rhizome, delved into how utilities are tackling extreme weather events across the U.S. using Rhizome's AI-powered platform. This platform helps electric utilities identify vulnerabilities from climate threats, quantify risks, and measure the economic and social benefits of grid-enhancing investments. Listen to the Startup Series here.
👨🏭 Giulia Siccardo is the Director of the US DOE Manufacturing & Energy Supply Chains Office (MESC). Established in 2022, MESC aims to strengthen and scale America's clean energy supply chains through investments in manufacturing capacity, workforce development, and data analysis of supply chain vulnerabilities. This conversation focuses on how the US is working to onshore the manufacturing of key clean energy supply chains. Listen to the podcast here.
👩💻 Climate Jobs
For more open positions, check out the #j-climatejobs channel in MCJ Slack as well as our MCJ Job Board.
Recycling Materials Sourcing Manager at AMP Sortation (Remote)
Data Warehousing Specialist at Clarasight (Remote)
Building Electrical Lead at Crusoe (Arvada, CO)
Supply Analyst at David Energy (Remote)
Senior Electrical Engineer at Fleetzero (Birmingham, AL)
Environmental Health and Safety Specialist at Heirloom (Shreveport, LA)
Sales Manager and Senior Process Engineer at Tender Foods (Somerville, MA)
Forest Carbon Scientist at Pachama (Remote)
Product Marketing Lead at Patch (San Francisco, CA)
Product Manager at Runwise (Remote)
Failure Analysis Quality Engineer at SPAN (San Francisco, CA)
✨ Community Highlights
• AirMiners Launchpad engages with entrepreneurs in an intensive six-week program for early carbon removal teams or individuals striving to advance their startup to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Apply HERE by Aug 8th for the next batch (September thru October 2024). Applicants from underrepresented backgrounds are especially encouraged to apply!
🗓 Events
Click the event title for details & RSVP info. For more climate events, check out the #c-events channel in MCJ Slack.
👩💻 MCJ + Climate People Climate Career Advancement Meetup: Many jobs are never posted. Rather, they are filled through connections. Join us for an interactive session focused on stories from the hidden job market! Hear from various professionals who landed jobs even though they were never posted - what worked for them, how they landed their roles, and what advice they have for you. (July 17)
🚺 Women in Climate Meetup: Monthly virtual meetup for women who work in, or want to work in climate. (July 31)
The MCJ Collective Newsletter is a free weekly email curating news, jobs, My Climate Journey podcast episodes, and other noteworthy happenings in the MCJ member community.
💭 If you have feedback or items you’d like to include, feel free to reach out.
🤝 If you’d like to become an MCJ community member, apply today.
💡 Have a climate-related event or content topic that you'd like to see in the MCJ newsletter? Email us at content@mcjcollective.com
Great post, thanks. New subscriber here.
Re: "Second, people often can’t see the way that their philanthropic donations can make a difference, even on an issue they care about. That might be because they have lost a certain amount of hope—and we believe that hope is a greater driver than despair." -- I wrote a post recently about hope, apathy and scaremongering that may be of interest: https://open.substack.com/pub/predirections/p/on-hope-apathy-and-scaremongering?r=2r7az9&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thank you for highlighting the importance of philanthropy in scaling CDR. Could you also mention 3 directions that we can take in order to increase the allocation of philanthropic funds to CDR? Best, Paris