Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry A.'s avatar

MCJ, why are you lending your channel to an incomplete, clearly biased and laughably transparent shill from a nuclear company that doesn’t even mention a fundamental challenge nuclear continues to face: cost? From someone who claims “$16B clean energy build out” from a prior role trying to make Transcanada look good, no less?

“Sponsorship” $$$ to carry it?

Nuclear has real strengths, risks, and barriers. This undermines an effective discussion of all of those, and destroys your credibility.

Other channels have the integrity to clearly label sponsored content. You can do so much better, MCJ team. We need you to do better to effectively address the scale of the challenge and opportunity we face.

I hope and believe you can.

Expand full comment
Marshall Kirkpatrick's avatar

Let's see what Indigenous people have to say about this. They've got a strong historical interest, looking backwards and forwards. There is a range of perspectives, of course, but to expand this conversation, check out November's "Assembly of First Nations (AFN) Bulletin – Final Report on 2024 Dialogue Sessions and Recommendations to the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO)."

Overview at https://afn.ca/all-news/bulletins/assembly-of-first-nations-afn-bulletin-final-report-on-2024-dialogue-sessions-and-recommendations-to-the-nuclear-waste-management-organization-nwmo/

The full report includes 8 recommendations, the first being:

"The AFN respectfully urges that comprehensive and meaningful dialogue, consultation, and engagement be undertaken with all affected First Nations throughout the site selection process, and before any critical decisions are made regarding the Deep Geological Repository or transportation routes. It is essential that the perspectives of all First Nations who rely on the same watershed as the proposed site, as well as those along the transportation route, be respected and fully integrated, in a manner that honors their inherent right to self-determination. This approach will ensure a more inclusive and equitable process for all."

The second is "The AFN strongly urges that robust First Nations-led emergency response plans and communication systems be developed and implemented prior to site selection and the transportation of nuclear waste through First Nations lands. This includes comprehensive source water protection measures for First Nations."

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts